Hamadan rugs do not come from one workshop, one village or one design. The name can refer to the city of Hamadan, the surrounding province, or a broad market group that brought many western Iranian weaving traditions together. That is why one Hamadan rug may have a bold geometric medallion while another uses a compact all-over Mahi field.
The most useful way to understand the group is to combine structure, complete design and regional context. This guide draws on a Persian survey of 304 completed and in-progress rugs, plus a separate study of two documented Hamadan-area carpets. It turns that research into a readable visual method without treating any single knot, colour or flower as proof of origin. You can compare current examples in the Hamadan rug collection.
What is a Hamadan rug?
A Hamadan rug is a hand-knotted Persian rug associated with Hamadan and its wider weaving region in western Iran. In the rug trade, the name often works as an umbrella. More specific labels can include Tuyserkan, Nahavand, Hosseinabad, Nanaj, Boyukabad, Mazlaghan and other towns or villages connected with the regional market.
This breadth is not a flaw in the name. It records the role of Hamadan as both a weaving centre and a commercial centre. Rugs made in nearby communities moved through the same market, while designs and techniques travelled between neighbours. A careful description should therefore keep the broad Hamadan relationship visible while preserving a more local attribution when the evidence supports one.
The survey's regional spread makes an important point. Hamadan accounted for 36.3 percent of the observed rugs, but Kabudarahang, Malayer, Asadabad, Tuyserkan and Nahavand were also represented. The results describe a network, not a single village recipe. For more on how these names fit beside other Iranian traditions, see the illustrated guide to Persian rug types.
How to read a Hamadan rug
1. Treat the label as a starting point
Begin with the seller's attribution, any older documentation and the rug's known history. Then ask what the label actually means. Does it identify Hamadan broadly, or a more specific place within the province? Is it a family record, an old dealer label, or a recent visual comparison?
Trade names can move. Two rugs with similar red fields may have different structures, and two rugs with the same village label may have different designs. A good attribution becomes stronger when the written history agrees with the physical rug.
2. Examine the foundation from the back
A pile rug is built from warps running lengthwise, wefts crossing horizontally, and knots tied around the warps. The Hamadan survey divided its sample into two large groups according to wefting. A single-weft rug has one weft shoot between rows of knots. A double-weft rug has two. In this survey, the double-weft examples used one thick and one thin weft.
This is a structural observation, not the same thing as knot type. The symmetrical knot, often called the Turkish knot in rug literature, dominated both survey groups. It appeared in 92.9 percent of the single-weft sample and 98.9 percent of the double-weft sample. Persian or asymmetrical knots were present in small numbers.
Look with good light and magnification, especially if the pile is dense or the rug has repairs. Compare several areas rather than one worn corner. Our guide to knots in Persian rugs explains why knot form, warp arrangement and number of wefts should be recorded separately.
3. Read the complete design system
Stand far enough away to see the whole rug. Is the composition controlled by a central medallion, repeated from end to end, or organized as an all-over field? Do the corner pieces echo the centre? Does the main border act as a quiet frame, or does it carry its own sequence of boteh, flowers and angular leaves?
The survey found a strong relationship between weave group and drawing. Geometric or angular designs made up 78.9 percent of the single-weft sample. Curvilinear designs made up 90 percent of the double-weft sample. These are useful tendencies, especially when several clues agree, but they should never be turned into a shortcut that ignores the rest of the rug.
4. Evaluate materials and condition separately
Wool pile and cotton foundations predominated in the recorded material fields, but some entries were unspecified and a few exceptions appeared. That means the category name alone cannot confirm fibre. If material matters to a purchase, inspect the actual rug or rely on a product record based on physical examination.
Condition is another independent question. Check the ends, selvedges, foundation, pile direction and areas of uneven wear. Repairs, fading and past cleaning can change both structure and colour. A handmade irregularity may belong to the rug's character, while an active split or loose end still needs attention.
Single-weft and double-weft tendencies
The single-weft rugs in the study were generally smaller and more angular. Among completed examples, 52.4 percent measured under three square metres, and their reported average area was 3.18 square metres. Most recorded raj counts fell between 21 and 30. Raj is a traditional measure of knot rows over a local unit, so it should not be converted casually into knots per square inch.
The double-weft completed rugs averaged 4.7 square metres, and 41.1 percent measured under three square metres. Their raj counts spread more broadly across 26 to 40. The group also contained more curvilinear designs. This does not mean that every larger or finer Hamadan-area rug is double-weft. It means the survey found a useful statistical pattern across the rugs it observed.
The paper's conclusion distinguishes rural and city weaving as well. Rural production is associated more often with robust pile, simpler angular drawing and traditional village formats. City weaving can use more controlled curvilinear cartoons and somewhat higher raj counts. Market demand, neighbouring regions and changing workshop practice complicate that division, which is why the back and front must be read together.
Major Hamadan design families
Geometric medallions and corner pieces
Many familiar Hamadan-area rugs use a central or repeated medallion with sharply stepped outlines. The corners may mirror part of the centre, while small flowers, leaves, animals or geometric fillers occupy the spaces between. Strong dark outlines help each shape remain legible against red, blue or ivory grounds.
Medallions are widespread across Persian weaving, so their presence does not establish origin. What matters is the relationship among centre, corners, field fillers, borders and structure. The current rug above provides one contemporary comparison, not a template for the whole region.
Mahi or Herati repeats
Mahi means fish in Persian, and the name is often paired with Herati. In woven form, the so-called fish can become highly stylized leaf-like units arranged around a central rosette. Connecting stems allow the unit to repeat across the field. The result may look floral, geometric, or somewhere between the two.
The Bzchlu rug studied by Azam Rasouli measures 200 by 145 centimetres in the paper's record. It is useful because the author first shows the entire composition, then separates medallion, rosette, field and border details. That sequence is a better model for looking than starting with a single isolated symbol.
The survey also names boteh, bouquet, banded bouquet, corner-medallion and Zill-e Soltan designs. Rural examples more often use angular corner-medallions, boteh, banded layouts and Mahi fields. City examples are associated more often with curvilinear Shah Abbasi, bouquet, afshan and Zill-e Soltan compositions. These categories overlap, and a design can be translated into more angular or more flowing drawing by different weaving communities.
Why borders matter
A border is not simply empty framing. Its width, repeated unit and relationship with the field can help identify a local design language. Rasouli discusses the broad Miri border of the Bzchlu rug as a sequence of boteh-related forms and connecting bands. A narrower border uses another repeating leaf or fish-like unit.
The practical lesson is simple: include the borders in every photograph used for identification. A close crop of the field may hide the information that best separates one regional comparison from another.
Pictorial rugs and the limits of symbolism
Hamadan-area weaving also includes pictorial rugs. Rasouli's second case study is a Houshang Shah rug attributed in the paper to the area around Malayer and dated 1230 AH. It depicts the legendary king's court, ministers, supernatural attendants and figures wearing clothing associated with Qajar-era European diplomats.
Some information is relatively direct. The paper notes a reversed woven inscription naming Houshang Shah. Recognizable clothing, crowns, guards and court arrangement also guide the reading. Other meanings are interpretive. A viewer may connect the throne, lion-and-sun imagery, symmetry or supernatural figures with larger religious and political ideas, but those readings depend on context and argument.
The author makes an especially valuable caution: not every rug motif is symbolic. Some forms are decorative, some record a weaver's personal choice, and some can support several meanings. The paper proposes Mithraic readings for parts of the Bzchlu medallion, rosette, Mahi field and borders. Those proposals belong to the study's scholarly interpretation. They are not agreed facts about every similar rug and are not an authentication tool.
Regional variation around Hamadan
Hamadan's neighbours help explain its range. The survey notes Arak-area influence toward one side of the province and Kurdish or Bijar influence in other districts. Contact with Zanjan-area weaving also appears in the discussion. Designs, cartoons and working methods crossed administrative borders long before modern online categories were created.
This is why more specific collection labels are useful when the evidence supports them. Compare Tuyserkan rugs, Nahavand rugs and Malayer rugs without assuming they are visually uniform. The dedicated Malayer rug guide shows how much variation can exist inside just one connected area.
Choosing a Hamadan rug for a room
Start with format. Runners suit halls and long transitions, but exact width, door clearance and turns matter. Small village rugs can anchor an entry or reading corner. Room-size examples work under seating or dining groups when enough of the field and border remains visible.
Then decide how you want the design to behave. A strong medallion creates a focal point and benefits from open space around the centre. An all-over repeat tolerates furniture covering part of the field because the pattern continues beyond any one point. Dark grounds add depth, while red fields bring warmth and energy.
Finally, use the individual listing for fibre, construction, age, measurements, repairs and condition. The Hamadan label provides cultural and regional context. It should not replace evidence about the actual rug in front of you.
Frequently asked questions
Are all Hamadan rugs single-weft?
No. The 304-rug survey recorded 114 single-weft and 190 double-weft examples. The distribution varied by locality and production context, so the individual rug must be examined.
Do all Hamadan rugs use symmetrical knots?
No, although symmetrical knots strongly predominated in both survey groups. A small number of asymmetrical knots were recorded. Knot type alone does not prove origin.
Is Mahi the same as Herati?
The names are often paired in rug writing. Mahi means fish, while Herati identifies a repeating design built around a central rosette and surrounding leaf-like forms. Local versions can differ in geometry, spacing and connecting stems.
What is the best first photograph for identification?
Photograph the complete front in neutral light, then add the complete back, close views of several knot rows, both ends, both sides and any repairs or labels. A field-only close-up hides too much information.
Can one motif reveal the rug's meaning?
Usually not. Motifs gain meaning through placement, repetition, neighbouring forms and cultural context. Scholarly symbolism can be illuminating, but it should remain clearly separated from visible construction and provenance.
Sources
- Farideh Talebpour, “A Study of the Characteristics of Hamadan Carpets,” Jelve-ye Honar, volume 3, issue 2, printed pages 23-28. View the journal record.
- Azam Rasouli, “Critical Study of Two Samples of Hamedan Carpets Using Symbolistic and Semiotic Approach,” Goljaam, volume 10, issue 26, printed pages 15-30. View the journal record.
Ready to compare complete examples? Browse the current Hamadan rug collection.
Laissez un commentaire