A horseman turns in the saddle, drawing his bow. Across the dark blue field, another rider answers his pose. Between them, running animals and fine flower stems fill the gaps. The detail above, from the hunting carpet in Milan's Museo Poldi Pezzoli, is full of action. It is also carefully balanced.
That tension gives Persian hunting carpets much of their fascination. The chase suggests speed, danger and an uncertain outcome. The carpet holds it within borders, repeated forms and an ordered field. A moment that ought to be over in seconds becomes something the eye can return to for years.
What is a Shikargah or hunting scene rug?
Shikargah is Persian for “hunting ground”. In English-language descriptions, the design is also called a hunting scene, and rugs featuring it are described as hunting carpets or shikargah carpets. These names refer to imagery, not a particular knot or weaving town. The design evokes hunters, their prey and the surrounding plants.
The label is broader than it first sounds. In descriptions of historic carpets, it can include animals fighting one another without any human hunters at all. The institutional account of the exhibition Hunt for Paradise uses the term for both hunting scenes and animal combat set within floral ornament.
It helps, then, to separate the name of the group from what a particular carpet actually shows. Mounted archers make a human hunt explicit. A lion attacking another animal belongs to a related visual world, but tells a different kind of story. Neither should be confused with a peaceful arrangement of birds among flowers simply because animals are present.
A chase organised around a medallion
The Milan carpet makes the relationship between movement and order unusually clear. Step back from the riders and a large red medallion takes command. Red corner sections echo its colour and shape. Between them lies the blue field, threaded with flowers and small episodes of pursuit.
The hunters do not travel together towards a single destination. Some turn one way, some another; related figures recur across the field. At close range, an individual horse and rider can hold our attention. From farther away, those figures become part of the carpet's rhythm, as important to its balance as the flowers around them.
This is why “hunting” and “medallion” are not competing descriptions. One names the subject; the other describes its arrangement. Our article on Persian rug medallions explores that organising framework more broadly.
The carpet's present appearance also carries the marks of its later history. The museum records that it was assembled from fragments and that missing areas were woven in tapestry technique in the late nineteenth century. What survives is both a Safavid composition and an object that later generations worked to preserve.
The hunt travelled between different arts
In Safavid court culture, hunting was an elite pursuit and a powerful artistic subject. It offered artists horses in motion, richly dressed figures, weapons, animals and landscape. Those ingredients could move between a carpet, a book page and a furnishing textile without becoming identical designs.
Consider this velvet panel, made around 1540 and attributed by the Metropolitan Museum of Art to Iran, probably Tabriz. Its hunting scene belongs to the same broad world of courtly imagery, but the material is velvet, not knotted carpet pile.
Daniel Walker's study of Safavid carpets in Encyclopaedia Iranica connects their figural and ornamental designs with the arts of the book. The connection becomes easier to imagine beside a drawing such as A Princely Hunt, attributed to Khorasan and dated to the late sixteenth century.
Here the action divides into small encounters. Riders and animals occupy the central scene, while more figures inhabit the margins. Even the frame is stepped rather than simply rectangular. The page invites the eye to move between episodes, much as a densely figured carpet does.
Rather than a documented model for the Milan carpet, this drawing offers a parallel: the same subject can fill an expansive scene or become a small, repeating ornament.
When the animals take over
Remove the riders and the drama need not disappear. In the Met's Silk Animal Carpet, dated to the second half of the sixteenth century and attributed to Iran, probably Kashan, animals confront and attack one another across a red field.
The museum identifies familiar creatures alongside spotted dragons and horned, deer-like beasts influenced by Chinese imagery. This is not a record of animals that shared one hunting ground. Observation and invention coexist, with the fantastic creatures woven into the same flowering world as the recognisable ones.
Such scenes can invite readings about power, conflict or an idealised garden. The Hunt for Paradise exhibition also connected the hunt with poetic and spiritual pursuit. These interpretations enrich the subject without supplying a fixed translation for every animal. Related combinations of figures, beasts and ornament appear in the Sanguszko carpets, a distinctive group considered separately.
A twentieth-century artist rethinks the hunting ground
The tradition did not end with its Safavid examples. In twentieth-century Isfahan, painter and carpet designer Mohammad Hossein Mosavver al-Molki returned to hunting imagery with a different sense of how to arrange it.
A Persian-language study by Ali Asghar Shirazi and Hesam Keshavarz in Goljaam compares five of his hunting designs with Safavid carpets, including the Milan example. Its most interesting finding is not simply that the later artist borrowed older motifs. It is that he changed the setting around them.
Compare this carpet with the Milan example above. Here, seven mounted hunters occupy different levels of one upright scene. Separate trees and flowering plants stand between the encounters. Instead of circling a large medallion, the eye moves from the lower riders towards those higher in the field.
In the designs they examine, the authors identify a stronger vertical direction and a more landscape-like organisation. Separate flowering shrubs replace much of the continuous floral scrollwork familiar from their Safavid comparisons. They also describe changes to horses' proportions and tails that bring the animals closer to naturalistic drawing.
The detail makes the change in setting tangible. A flowering tree occupies one side of the rider, while smaller plants punctuate the ground beneath the horse. These individual forms leave open space around the figures. The drawing remains stylised, but the plants help give each encounter a place within the larger scene.
The comparison concerns one designer and a selected group of works, not a rule dividing all old carpets from all modern ones. Earlier Iranian carpets could also have directional compositions. Mosavver al-Molki's achievement, as the study presents it, was a particular reinvention of inherited material: the riders remain familiar, but the ground they inhabit has changed.
Return to the Milan detail and the flower stems begin to matter as much as the drawn bows. The hunt supplies the action; repetition, scale and the spaces between figures determine how we experience it. Across these works, the enduring subject is not only the chase. It is the artist's problem of making movement belong to a patterned surface.
Sources and image records
- Ali Asghar Shirazi and Hesam Keshavarz, An Analysis of the Mohammad Hossein Mosavver Al-Molki's Hunting Carpet Designs Based on the Safavid Hunting Carpets, Goljaam 7(20), 2011, pp. 73-96. Full Persian paper consulted; the later designs are discussed principally on pp. 83-93.
- Daniel Walker, Carpets ix. Safavid Period, Encyclopaedia Iranica.
- Museo Poldi Pezzoli, Hunting Carpet. Featured detail and full view: Google Arts & Culture reproductions via Wikimedia Commons, detail image record and full image record, Public Domain.
- Soudavar Memorial Foundation, Hunt for Paradise: Court Arts of Safavid Iran, 1501-1576, institutional exhibition account.
- Metropolitan Museum of Art: Velvet Panel with Hunting Scene; A Princely Hunt; Silk Animal Carpet. Object records and Public Domain images.
- Catalogue terminology: Salar Jung Museum, Persian carpet, via Google Arts & Culture; Christie's, Isfahan rug with a hunting scene.
Laissez un commentaire